Redox flow battery with its cell stack connected to electrolyte pipes and valves

· Translated from the Spanish original

Energy storage

A recyclable sulfur flow battery keeps 98.1% of its capacity over 2,200 cycles

Nature Sustainability published on October 23 an oligo(disulfide) anolyte from Zhengzhou, tested in a 63 Wh stack with closed-loop recycling.

What happened

  • On October 23, 2026, Nature Sustainability published work by six authors from the College of Chemistry at Zhengzhou University, China.
  • They designed an anolyte, the negative-side electrolyte, based on oligo(disulfide)s: the bonds between sulfur atoms store the charge. It is made by polymerising the potassium form of thioctic acid.
  • With a sulfonated cobalt phthalocyanine catalyst it reached 128 ampere-hours per litre and 95.5% material utilisation.
  • It kept 98.1% of its capacity after 2,200 cycles at about 70% energy efficiency, and the team validated closed-loop recycling in a 63 Wh stack.

Why it matters

  • Aqueous flow batteries can store grid energy for hours. According to the authors, they lacked anolytes that were cheap, stable, recyclable and high-capacity all at once.
  • For grids with a lot of solar and wind, storage lasting several hours lets that energy be used outside its window. This work targets one concrete part of that system.
  • 63 Wh is lab scale, and grid batteries are measured in megawatt-hours. The industrial leap remains to be shown.

The number

98.1%. Capacity retained after 2,200 cycles at 100 mA per square centimetre.

Context

The abstract describes the starting thioctic acid as “endogenous”, a molecule the body itself makes, and the authors link that to environmental compatibility. Ring-opening polymerisation, they explain, offers a scalable route to high concentrations of active material.

What’s next

  • No scale-up timeline announced.
  • The authors report no cost per kWh.

Bottom line

Genesis opened a 100 MW, 200 MWh battery at Huntly, and Viridi installed 3.75 MWh inside a 105-home building: the gap between 63 Wh and the grid is measured in those orders.

Sources


Edited by Rodrigo Cornejo. How we select and verify: who writes these notes.

Related notes

← All notes